I used scare quotes around "scientific" because I do not want to be accused of affirming that these arguments have been confirmed by some sort of valid, generally accepted empirical method. I have no idea if they have or have not been so confirmed. However, they are being presented in that way, and they seem open to empirical confirmation or disconfirmation. So in that sense, they are of a scientific nature. I am curious if they have all been refuted.
Age of the Earth; 101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth and the Universe.
Let me add that currently I am an "Old Earther," believing that the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and that the Universe is about 13.7 billion years old. But if it turns out that that is a wrong belief, I won't lose any sleep over it.